Why women dress like sluts (Spoiler: it's not the reason you're hoping).
Say you see some hot bitch and she’s wearing a skirt so short you can see her belly button and showing more cleavage than a melting Arctic glacier—naturally, you think, “She must want sex, right? I mean, if she didn’t want sex, you think, she’d be wearing conservative clothes, right? Like jogging pants and “I’m A Lesbian” flats, instead of tight Spandex® and five-inch “Fuck Me Pumps,” right? Right?” Yeah, sure, it makes sense. But you’d be wrong.
Because when it comes to what type of clothing women choose to wear (or how much), ‘attracting men’ doesn’t even figure into the decision (prostitutes excepted, of course).
Women don’t dress sexy for you.
Most guys think that women dress sexy to “get a guy.” But that’s because most guys don’t understand women any better than they understand Italian opera. As it turns out, there’s really only one real reason women dress like sluts.
At a very base level, men traditionally want a woman to fuck, and women want a father who can provide for her future offspring — two decidedly different end goals, right? If women wanted to have sex 24/7, and men wanted nothing more than to father and raise children, human conflict would immediately cease.
Instead, men and women are operating at cross-purposes. They’re both stuck having to trade favors with each other to get what they truly want. For example, men agree to marry a girl with the understanding that it will lead to regular sex (only to later learn that by “regular sex,” she meant infrequent and dispassionate sex). And women agree (at least in theory) to have sex to achieve their goal of bearing kids.
Why most hot women are cock-teases.
The difficult thing for most men to understand is the seemingly cruel way women go about trying to get what they want.
For example, a woman who dresses slutty when she doesn’t actually want sex is guilty of “false advertising” or, more realistically, of being a “goddamn cock-tease.” Because her sexy attire is not only a gross misrepresentation of her intent, it causes an instinctive and involuntary physiological response in men, too. One that does more than gets his hopes up (if you know what we mean).
Women don’t even have to have sex to make men believe that they like having sex. By dressing like a tramp, women can imply that they’ll give men what they want (i.e. non-stop boot knocking) Men don’t have the same option.
Yeah, men can also imply that they’re “capable of providing” what women want. But a woman don’t respond physiologically to a man who tells her he has a prestigious job, a fancy home, exotic cars, or a black American Express card. In fact, men can’t emotionally jerk around a woman...well, not until they’re already dating anyway.
Women don’t have to “hope” that a guy who owns an exotic sports car or has a fancy house is rich. Because he owns a fucking exotic sports car or a fancy house! She can be pretty certain he’s probably not a fucking janitor.
Imagine if a man flaunted his wealth to get a woman to marry him, but then, over the years, he spent less and less money on her. Would women be okay with that?
Men, on the other hand, have no way of knowing if a woman will provide sex or not from the way she dresses. Yet men continue to make assumptions about it (incorrect assumptions, as it turns out). Because dressing sexy isn’t a means to get a man, friend. It’s a fuck-load more than that.
Not all women want sex, but all women want attention.
Like we've already said elsewhere, women aren’t driven by sex the way men are. For too many women, the actual act of sex is superfluous, a “favor” they exchange to get the man they want (or to get knocked up when they’re fertile — remember, always wear a condom!) But that’s only part of the reason why women shop at Whores R’ Us. As usual, the Family Guy’s Peter Griffin asks the obvious question:
You know what really grinds my gears? This Lindsay Lohan. Lindsay Lohan with all those little outfits, jumping around there on stage, half-naked with your little outfits. Ya know? You’re a...You’re out there jumping around and I’m just sitting here with my beer. So, what am I supposed to do? What you want? You know, are we gonna go out? Is that what you’re trying to — why, why are you leaping around there, throwing those things all up in my, over there in my face? What do you want, Lindsay? Tell me what you want? Well, I’ll tell you what you want, you want nothing. You want nothing. All right? Because we all know that no woman anywhere wants to have sex with anyone, and to titillate us with any thoughts otherwise is — is just bogus.
So what does she want? Why is she “leaping around there, throwing those things all up in your, over there in your face?” Because...she was trying to get noticed. Yeah, we know...WTF? Weirdly, there’s almost no correlation between dressing like a slut and actually being one (which helps explain why guys always think a girl “was asking for it”) The two aren’t linked together like you grew up believing — you can thank porn for that one.
For women, the whole point of being sexy is to be the center of attention. And not just because fills a childhood void left by their father’s neglect (although it does that, too). No, being the most-noticed woman at a club or a party means that woman has the most power and stature.
Power is the only aphrodisiac that actually works.
When it comes down to it, women are craven, greedy little toads just like men. They want to have their needs matter to other people, regardless of gender. Needs like stature and influence. In short, they want to have things their way. And that requires having some kind of power. People — and that includes women — can get power in a variety of ways. They can get really good at something, like music or art. They can excel at business and make millions. Or they can scour the planet for the One Ring to rule them all.
But rather than getting it through personal achievement or business success, many women simply choose the easy way, by appealing to a man’s baser instincts — in effect, they cheat. They wear clothes that accentuate their bodies: Collars that dip lower than the 2008 Dow Jones Index, with skirts and heels higher than Snoop Dog after a ride on Willie Nelson’s tour bus.
Why? Because, for women — regardless of the number of advanced degrees they have, or how many Nobel Peace Prizes they’ve won — attention is a kind of currency; currency they can use to get anything they want.
Attention gets women free drinks, but it also gives them the power to influence people and get their way in places other than bars, too.
For example, let’s say there’s a beautiful girl at the office. As the best looking woman, and therefore Alpha-Female, she can extract favors from the men who hope to sleep with her. Why do you think that incompetent GILF, Sarah Palin, was considered a viable U.S. Vice President candidate in 2008. Think it was her brains? Get serious. It was because she was the best-looking Republican female politician they could find. They figured a hottie would get the male vote, and that women would embrace one of their own. But, in addition to all the countless other mistakes they’d made over recent years, the RNC failed to realize that women would see a more attractive women as a threat.
We could have told them that whenever a pretty woman wearing little more than a smile enters a room, men aren’t the only ones who notice. Sure, men will instantly check the woman out, but other women will look at her, too — though for very different reasons (guys want to fuck her, and women want to repeatedly stab her in the face).
Fully-clothed women see scantily dressed harlots as a direct threat to getting what they want: Attention.
Cleavage + Tight Jeans = ~Power
There are better, more effective sources of power in the world, but cleavage works pretty damn well. A nice set of honkers has the same appeal to men that a Mercedes does for women. Women display them prominently for the same reason men leave their car keys out on the bar — to flaunt it. Women with fake DD-cup boobs shove them right in the face of less well-endowed women. Less well-endowed women counter-punch by not wearing underwear. It’s an arms race of exposed flesh, and men benefit most, but not without a lot of confusion.
Now, to be fair, men do the same kind of preening. Like when a man tools up to valet parking in a Ferrari Spyder, he’s not doing it because he’s going racing at Le Mans after dinner. He’s driving that car to make other guys look like pathetic Honda Accord-driving losers. It’s pure Darwinism...you know, except with cars.
Revealing clothes accomplish the same thing for women. Places like Frederick’s of Hollywood are any woman’s ace in the hole. Because, when all women in a room are of equal attractiveness, the sluttier dressed woman wins the battle for attention. After all, while men notice women pretty quickly in general, they notice women in 5-inch heels and a micro-miniskirt a helluva lot faster.
Consider this sexist joke:
A manager is interviewing two female candidates for a position. The first is a dual major Physics and Macroeconomics with a 4.0 GPA from Harvard Business School. The second graduated summa cum laude from Yale with an MBA from Wharton. So which candidate gets the job? The one with the biggest tits.
There’s a moral in there somewhere.
So why do women dress like sluts?
In short, dressing sexy is inherently competitive and a power play for chicks. They do it to compete in the hierarchy of attractiveness, essentially to one-up other women, put less attractive girls in their place, be the best-looking girl in the room, and make other women look like old, asexual nuns.
Whichever girl gets the most male attention gets her pick of the “fittest” (or richest) men. And if being the most attractive women attracts the best men, that’s a bonus. But sexy dressed women aren’t out to attract the Alpha Male in the room, they’re out to be the Alpha Bitch.
Dressing hot is about climbing to the top of our beauty-based status structure and outrank other women in the prettiness pecking order. Being out in public is like being in a beauty contest for women, except that the grand prize isn’t flowers and a sash, it’s ego-stroking and attention.
Contrary to what most men think, women only spend all that time and money on make-up, hair-styling and fashion to impress other women.
You didn’t seriously think she was going to all that trouble just to attract a creature that would still fuck her even if she wore a burlap bag and looked like The Elephant Man, did you? Why would she bother?



fuck off
this site is a fucking waste of time it dosn't have one insight on how women are by the w ay im a man and my experienece of a relationship dosn't tell me shit about what women are and want they are pecieved as! fuck you dick head i think maybe you don't have any experience about women and just guessing.
Ahem.
See next comment. Read this article. (And then suck it.)
Excellent
Finally, a man that understands women. In my estimation you are absolutely correct. I am female, and have spent years in the exact situations you describe. I think if a male doesnt want to believe what you wrote, then he is just kidding himself. (By the way, I am a Christian, how I stumbled onto your site I don't know, and I dont like your language at all - still, your point is correct :P [all expect for the money part - not all women want men's money, I would die if my husband spent his hard earned money on me; if i want to buy something i'll earn the money myself])
Right
This woman is about on par as far as levels of stupid as the first poster.
Oh, and you'd die if your husband spent money on you? Is that after he made the house/car/utility bill payment? Or is it after he bought you some new clothes? Or in your case, maybe a Bible?
:)
i totally agree! That's why the beauty industry makes billions! It's so true- i've always wondered why girls like to dress the way they do (including myself of course).
Hello
Again a good article about the women and really you have posted it so good and nice....you are given the truth about women.......
LOL
LOL @ That Guy Below me.... What a douche.
These articles are amazing. Honestly.
Thanls for all you do <3
That guy as in the fucker at
That guy as in the fucker at top?
lol
pretty much
am female, and this article is scarily accurate. except for the all women wanting "money and cars" shit. Shoulda stuck to wanting "power" imo; for different women said power will provide them with different things. which will ofc all be things they want, not necessarily being money though; being rich isnt anywhere near the top of my priorities (i'm doing art at uni for gods sake) however i completely agree with the power/social structure thing; we women just turn said power into different things. it's all forms of control really.
Yep! Right on the money!
When I read this article, an awful lot of what I have lived through and come to suspect over many years suddenly became very clear, obvious even. This article is deadly accurate!
To all the other guys out there (and I bet there are plenty) who have fallen for that old romantic myth, largely put out by women - you know, the one about them wanting true love and a guy that really cares about them - please believe me when I tell that THEY DON'T.
Unlike nearly all men, women are VERY good at lying and pretending one thing in order to achieve another - and they are experts at manipulating men!
When a man is in love, he is basically a fool for the woman in question and would do anything for her. For men, love is a type of madness, and an extremely powerful one. But when a woman is in love, she isn't like that. She doesn't lose her head, or her judgement (but she knows only too well that men do) - she's just planning something! Women want what they want (usually a good life, and preferably as easy as possible for them, money, a home to be provided for them so they don't have to work, or worry, and the time and the freedom and lifestyle to have as many children as they want)and they are generally COMPLETELY AND UTTERLY without conscience in being prepared to use guys to get it. Worse than this - and this is the sickening part that most guys just can't accept - women think that this is a perfectly reasonable way for them to behave! Yes, almost unbelievable, isn't it! But it's true! Women don't see anything wrong with this (at least, they would NEVER admit it. They are completely convinced that they deserve this - that this is their right - simply because they are a woman. Astonishing arrogance really!
Women have much more control over their emotions than men, I believe that, and I've seen and felt the evidence for it, time and time again. Yes men! Please take it from me, this article is right on the money! The question is: as a guy, are you smart enough (or have you been hurt/screwed over enough yet by women) to see that.
Best of luck to you!
Yup, I agree, it's deadly
Yup, I agree, it's deadly accurate.
'The question is: as a guy, are you smart enough (or have you been hurt/screwed over enough yet by women) to see that.'
A little of both! I was never into the marriage or romance scene but certainly got enough flak from female employees using their wiles on me or overhearing them brag about doing it to others. Then there is all this stuff like this you see all over the web, the major reason I think why the marriage rate plunged and why most guys don't date anymore.
Here Here!!! You got it
Here Here!!! You got it correct sir!!! The ability to cry at the drop of a hat or smile and laugh so sweetly in order to get what they want/need... I used to put women on a pedistal but now I'm thinking something is screwed up in our society that this kindo of behaviour is considered acceptable... oh and don't forget the "now I'm in my thirties and need to trade up" syndrome.... christ!
Horrible article.
This article is ridiculously written from hindsight-bias...and definitely written by a women. Interesting how women are the smart ones, naturally preparing themselves for the future, while men are naturally hedonistic slaves to their own sex drives. Comments like "when it comes to what type of clothing women choose to wear (or how much), ‘attracting men’ doesn't even figure into the decision" and "A nice set of honkers has the same appeal to men that a Mercedes S-Class does for women." are just superficial and subjectively one-sided. This author claims that men simply don't understand women but [the author] seems to be omniscient when it comes to the "understanding" of men. The article abviously has some truth laced in and out of each paragraph, but it does things like stereotyping women by suggesting that "this is what all women do." and "this is what all women want." and inferring that men aren't really part of the equation when I women dresses a certain way. If you were speaking exclusively for yourself you may have a leg to stand on, but you can never know the mind of another person.
Seriously?
Wow. You don't know shit. It just sounds like you waste your time at frat parties, with the real winners, and have been rejected one too many times by a woman who dares to dress appealingly. Because they should all want you, right? You and individuals like yourself are just bitter, lonely dumbfucks who can't get laid so you bitch and moan about the sluts you wish you could fuck. It drives me nuts when guys complain about slutty chicks...then don't fuck them! Jesus, it's not that fucking complicated. Calling woman who are unafraid of their sexuality sluts is really you just pouting and pointing the finger at them because, in your mind, there is no reason why she shouldn't want you. Sluts exist because primitive jack-offs like you demand they exist. You think of women in a purely sexual sense and you crave and drool for those short skirts and low tops. You don't know your asshole from your elbow and I pity you.
it's a case of mutual selection...
Sluts, "jack-offs", another knuckle dragging troglodytes still exist because they keep choosing each other as mates. Each requires the other's existence to perpetuate its own. You can't have one without the other.
As long as there are men who can't keep it in their pants, and women DUMB ENOUGH to oblige these hormone crazed idiots, the cycle will continue.
Lol
"Sluts exist because primitive jack-offs like you demand they exist."
As far as I know, when I demand that a money tree exists in my garden, it doesn't.
idiot!
the article is well written and deep and accurate....the comment from this idiot is really stupid...he is the typical anglosaxon loser who studied and studied and studied again how to PLAY THE GAME with girls as a good school boy and he now wants play the role of the pickup artist who feels superior to the sluts clothes...even the expression "Jesus!" put in that point of his comment is part of his poor strategy to increase his status by dropping down other people...he has learned that women respond positively to a man who use this arrogant attitude of criticizing other people...this fucking loser is just a half man with a small willy who is desperately trying to play the role of the casanova playboy in order to get the attention of nice girls...and by doing all this shit he ends up exploiting female ingenuity and stupidity with verbal tricks in order to fuck a girl who soon get bored of this loser half actor because he has nothing but this GAME to offer and leave him frustrated and angry because he spent so many energies and he could never be himself with women and he did not obtain anything in the end apart from a fast fuck that left him needy of more love and attention and sex from the girl he eventually fucked
True
I think this is true. Women are the most egocentric and arrogant creatures on the planet. Obviously there is an exception to every rule but I have found this to be true over and over again. A lot of men are retarded too. Heck women are made to decieve. You hear a sweet voice and see a beautiful face and figure and instinctively feel that they can do no harm. So gullible, yet so true. I personally hate that side of me. I know better, yet I have to fight what I feel. Men are stupid and are always sizing up other men. Not that every guy out there is actually trustworthy either. But women take the cake. All I can say is beware of the big booty and a smile.
Prick teasers
women prick tease for power and a laugh,besides they know men can be easily manipulated when they show it all and these women milk the men dry,however like all hypocrites they can dish it out,but can't take it back,they say it's different when men do it to them,but what women want are double standards,not equality,they make me sick and have totally put me off of them after nearly 30 years of being prick teased,I would so love to be in a world with hardly any men,because I do it back to them and see how they like it.
Why sluts are not dating material.
Girls everywhere and all you emasculated "men" who are trying so hard to be politically correct at the expense of you maleness, listen up.
Men and women are equals. This does not mean that they are equal in every single thing they do. For example, men are, on average, physically stronger than women. It is much easier for a semi attractive (even a 6/10) woman to go out and get laid. The same cannot be said about men. Men have to work at it, have some skill (game) and thereby get a woman to sleep with them. It is a LOT harder for an equally attractive man to get women than it is the other way around. This is one of reasons behind why we, as a society, naturally celebrate men who are successful in bedding multiple women; while at the same time shame women who bed multiple men.
Let us briefly visit the topic of virginity from both perspectives. Virginity in a man is not a desirable state or label when it comes to an attribute that the opposite sex wants. This is because he has obviously not been preselected by other women. However, female virginity is not looked at negatively in the least by men. If she looks decent, no man cares if the girl is a virgin or not. In fact, a female virgin is often wanted more.
Now don't get me wrong, men LOVE sluts. We will never turn down an opportunity to sleep with a good looking slut. Partly because she's good in bed, partly because it's sex. But any decently intelligent, self-respecting man will know that it is a terrible idea to emotionally involve himself (i.e. date) a slutty girl. That would be a very dumb move. Why would any man want to get emotionally involved with a girl who's had 15+ sexual partners? We would just be setting ourselves up for failure. There are many nice worthy girls out there who don't have daddy issues and haven't slept with an entire fraternity house. But, by all means, fvck the brains out of sluts in the meanwhile.
Most guys can detect when a girl is a slut by the first few dates and by what he hears about the girl from other people and from the girl herlself. We put this information together and figure out if she is dating material or not. If not, I like most guys, will still go in for the prize but have no intention of following through with dating the dirty little tart.
To put it simply, a lock that can be opened by many keys is a useless lock and of little worth. But a key that can open many locks is a master key and is valuable.
Post new comment